Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bucky Baxter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 19:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bucky Baxter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obscure sessions musician and Dylan sideman; like many sessions musicians, undoubtedly a consummate pro, but not notable. Orange Mike | Talk 01:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:00, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:00, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (warn) @ 19:02, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:45, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems a solid, working musician, but I can't find much in the way of sources about his life beyond liner notes that prove he plays music. Having a job is not enough for meeting minimum notability standards. No good sources means no need for an article. --Jayron32 02:52, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There's likely more than enough coverage of him out there in the reviews of the albums and concerts he's performed on. This book, for example, covers his work with the Beastie Boys(!) in some detail [1]; Newsbank shows nearly 300 newspaper articles (many of which are likely to be passing mentions, but even if only 10% are nontrivial there should be a solid basis for an article. Sometimes articles on non-celebrities need to be constructed from many pieces and many sources -- not every notable person is Kardashian-class. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 04:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.