Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bucklind Beery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:40, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bucklind Beery[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: ludicrous joke of a non-article. Quis separabit? 20:52, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:13, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 00:13, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NACTOR. Hrodvarsson (talk) 00:46, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable actor and no significant reliable sourcing MLKLewis (talk) 21:10, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable actor and WP:NOTINHERITED also applies....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:22, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there are a few sources other there, mostly local newspaper articles and passing mentions in books, which could potentially be added. But even then it'd struggle to pass either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Biggest claim to fame is being the third in an Beery acting dynasty, and of itself that's not enough to justify this separate page. -- Euryalus (talk) 11:07, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails NACTOR and no refs. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:39, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.