Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bucher aircraft tractor (2nd nomination)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:41, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bucher aircraft tractor[edit]

AfDs for this article:
Bucher aircraft tractor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, just an auxiliary tool. Hardly any independent sources, both in English and German. The Banner talk 20:37, 2 April 2017 (UTC) Note: this is a second nomination, but I do not know how to add the box with prior AfDs. Usually Twinkle does that for me, but that had a hiccup. The Banner talk 20:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • KEEP, Vehicles are important enough for wikipedia. Also aircraft tugs /tractors.. This second nomination is just an other "witchhunt" from The Banner against articels I had written. Also he tried to hide this nomination for deletion from me, he had not.FFA P-16 (talk) 21:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have add now some more sources we have a book and also the offical Datashed from the VBS:
  • Military vehicles database: Bucher FS 10 - Official Swiss Armed Forces website
  • Markus Hofmann: Fahrzeuge der Schweizer Armee, 2015, ISBN 978-3-033-05038-9.

FFA P-16 (talk) 21:21, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

if you did not see the nomination straight away, sorry. Twinkle was having some hiccups. But it would be nice when you come with independent sources and not with accusations. The Banner talk 22:03, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep regarding the WP:NVEHICLES I cannot see a reason to delete this tow tractor especially since there's apparently no new argument since the first attempt. --MBurch (talk) 19:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:19, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@MilborneOne also specialised vehicles are notable for wikipedia.. it is not an limited use vehicle, it is used for F5E, F-5F, F/A-18C, F/A-18D, Superpuma, Cougar, Falcon 900, and will be used for the Pilatus PC-24 = most of the Aircraft intype and numbers of the Swiss Air Force. Also it is used to transport Missiles, External Tanks and spare parts on the Tarmac and aircraftcaverns.FFA P-16 (talk) 13:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 04:57, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep It doesn't appear to be outstandingly non-notable. Although WP:NVEHICLES is only an essay, I think it should give weight. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 20:25, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  12:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FFA P-16 (talk) 13:05, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

      • Blogs are not reliable secondary sources. - BilCat (talk) 13:22, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • Its not a Blog! ISBN Number! A blog has no ISBN. Its a book written by Markus Hofmann name of the Book is "Fahrzeuge der Schweizer Armee", ISBN 978-3-033-05038-9 It has 320 pages, 900 pictures covers the vehicles from 1900 to 2015, Hardcover, Format 240×280 mm, Autor Markus Hofmann, Co-Autoren Max Martin and Christoph Zimmerli.. that is what you can finde about this with this link.

ISBN 978-3-033-05038-9 google the isbn.FFA P-16 (talk) 13:48, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to the link a non-existing ISBN. The Banner talk 18:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The Wikipedia ISN is not complete, that why I had add the link.. But (like you knew perfect) by using google with the ISB you finde this Book [1] and [2] [3] also just use googel with "Fahrzeuge der Schweizer Armee" FFA P-16 (talk) 20:14, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and as per my arguments in the first AfD. As usual, FFA P-16 claims victimization. He has tried to back up his keep !vote by finding more sources but these reinforce how far the subject actually falls short of the threshold of Notabiity, being passing mentions, database listings etc. YSSYguy (talk) 13:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is nothing wrong with finding more sources. This is now a source more than in your first AfD. So the situation is because of this more on the keep side. We have some datas in German about it. And, the most important, we have now an interpendend Book, this should be enough weight.FFA P-16 (talk) 14:33, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
With the book being about every vehicle ever used by the Swiss military, I would be very much surprised if any mention of an aircraft tug with total production of less than a hundred will provide the weight that is required. What does it contain, one paragraph? Two? Less? YSSYguy (talk) 15:12, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well it has 320 pages, 900 pictures, covers the vehicles from 1900 to 2015. Tis aircraft Tug is in bigger numbers in service in the Swiss Military than for eg the Saurer 6DM Firefighting Trucks who are used on the AFB, but It is nor for wikipedia or the book relevant how many vehicles wehre build, even if only one was build it is enoug. Also you have to think of the size of the Swiss Military if you rise the questin about how much about it is in this book,a lot of vehices(types) in the Swiss Military doesent reach the number of 80-70 units. The Bucher aircraft tractor is the most important and most used aircraft Tug of the Swiss Air Force, it is used on every AFB and used with nearly the whole fleet of the Swiss Air Force , F-5E, F-5F, F/A-18C, F/A-18D, Superpuma, Cougar, Falcon900, DHC-6, Be1900 Be350,PC-6, PC-7, PC-12, ..PC-24. How ever to get back to the point today we have an interpendend Book published with an ISBN.FFA P-16 (talk) 15:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Once again you fail to answer the question; how much of those 320 pages is about the tug, one paragraph? Two? Less? It is completely irrelevant that it is used for moving nearly the whole inventory of the Swiss Air Force, is there significant coverage in multiple independent sources? Here's another question; how many different vehicles are covered in the book's 320 pages? YSSYguy (talk) 19:48, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
With all respect, this is now bizarre. Firstly, there is no wikipedia rule which prescribes how many pages in a book are necessary to make it valid for a topic as a reference. A book in which even the 20 GMC K 3500 covers of the Swiss army are listed. We now have an independent reference more than at the last delete discussion. Now you conduct an interrogation me about this book, at the same time it seems completely no matter the MB-2 tow tractor and U-30 Tow Tractor have no reference at all. The reference is given here and such a discrepancy of the reference is not appropriate, you can use googel and you can buy the book, if you want more details.FFA P-16 (talk) 03:11, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is a relevant Wikipedia rule, it is about the existence of significant coverage. If there is significant coverage, then the subject is notable, so it would help your case to demonstrate that there is such significant coverage, instead of repeating all the time "there's a book and it talks about the Bucher aircraft tractor". Nobody is disputing that the book exists (at least not now). Nobody is disputing that it is independent coverage. The question - and it's a very simple one - is, is it significant coverage? Typical obfuscation and "smoke and mirrors" on your part, refusing to answer questions when they are legitimately asked. Curious that you would add a reference without adding any more content to the article - perhaps it is because there is nothing in the book that is not already in the one-paragraph article. Feel free to nominate the MB-2 tow tractor and U-30 Tow Tractor articles for deletion and I will !vote to delete them at AfD; I have already nominated both of them for deletion once (here and here), so it will have to be via AfD discussions for them. YSSYguy (talk) 05:26, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I definitvil will NOT to nominate the MB-2 tow tractor and U-30 Tow Tractor articles for deletion! I am not one of this people who want ban informations! An I definitv would not vote for deletion if you (or someone other) nominate them again. No your queestion is not legitimately asked. It is only compulsion and harassment. I its so important for you.. Buy the Book!.The discussion of me with you is finished.Bye.FFA P-16 (talk) 17:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't need to buy the book. If you already have this book and it has a lot of detailed information in it, that will prove that the subject is notable, add the information to the article. Once you have demonstrated that there is significant coverage by expanding the article, I will change my !vote to keep. Otherwise, everything you have written here amounts to "it is notable because I say it is and the people who are arguing against my unsubstantiated pronouncement of notability are harassing me". YSSYguy (talk) 01:12, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bucher_aircraft_tractor_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1077974409"