Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Herman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 12:29, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Herman[edit]

Bryan Herman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Stub only has a single source that is not even close to being reliable, as it only contains his picture. Basic searches yield limited potential for reliable and significant coverage that could adequately establish this subject's notability. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 07:54, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 08:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete One of the GNG requirements is that coverage be substantial. A lone picture with just the name of the subject attached is not substantial. If this level of sourcing could establish notability, than there would be no limiting of articles in Wikipedia, and we would have so much uncontrolled little use articles that the entire project would break down.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:43, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'll admit to knowing little about skateboarding, but my search didn't find what I consider to be significant independent coverage of him that would meet WP:GNG. There are a lot of ghits, but it seems to consist mainly of ads and listings in skater databases. He also appears to be unranked as a competitor. The article certainly provides no evidence of notability and being a pro skateboarder does not grant automatic notability. Will reconsider if someone can provide the necessary sources. Papaursa (talk) 14:01, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.