Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brutonstock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Brutonstock

Non-notable party. One google hit on myspace.com. Deprodded. Weregerbil 13:00, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. PJM 13:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, and there is absolutly no context unless you use "What links here" in the toolbox.--blue520 13:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Deli nk 14:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Of the people who want this deleted there has been 2 reasons. Yes; Brutonstock currently has no context, because a link was made to it in the List of music festivals which was deleted without consultation. Brutonstock only gets one hit on Google because the information about it has been mainly spread by word of mouth, as a festival it is only just growing in popularity and a page on wikipedia would help establish fact from fiction, the organisers have plans to establish a website in the near feature for this music festival, I am in favoured of this article remaining at the current time. I purpose that this article to not be deleted and for the writers given a chance to improve upon it (giving more detail) until its website is opened and it gets more talking about, then it may be reconsidered. Daniel_eco_pren 01 june 2006.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.