Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brussels Tigers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect to Ligue Francophone de Football Amercain de Belgique. After the merge is performed, a redirect is typically, and should be put in place. North America1000 15:34, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brussels Tigers[edit]

Brussels Tigers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:CLUB or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 14:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and redirect - There is a serious question regarding the notability of the teams in the league, and there is virtually no content that is not duplicated in the league article and the articles for the other teams in the league. Any noteworthy content should be merged to Ligue Francophone de Football Amercain de Belgique with a redirect to that page. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:16, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and redirect - as above. Neutralitytalk 00:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge and redirect Amateur league, apparently below the level where we keep articles on the individual teams; DGG ( talk ) 03:45, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.