Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruderman Brothers, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted, unambiguous copyright infringement without any salvageable additions. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bruderman Brothers, Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company. half a dozen hits on gnews, all appear to be press coverage of their announcements. Fails WP:GNG Worm 14:06, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not only do the sources not show depth of coverage, but the article also fails other parts of WP:COMPANY. Also, I'd like to note that the entire article is an almost exact copy of [1]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slon02 (talk • contribs)
- I saw that, but I think the article existed before that newswire release... probably came from wikipedia, not the other way round. Worm 22:26, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment - unlikely. And if you check the About Us link at [2], it's pretty clear that it has been copied. -- Whpq (talk) 15:13, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Good point. I was looking at the news release, not thinking about the company's own page. Rookie mistake. Worm 15:27, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.