Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Sinclair
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. — FireFox (UTC) 10:57, 28 May '06
Bruce Sinclair[edit]
After reading article, I still don't have enough information to believe that he's notable. He might be, but the article does a poor job at asserting notability. Weak delete. --Nlu (talk) 11:51, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Were you reading the same article I was? The article says that he has played for several teams in Australia's National Rugby League, including being captain of one of them. How is that not notable? -- Chuq 13:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, notable sportsman in Australia, but needs expansion. --Terence Ong 13:41, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep! Transparently notable!! - ҉ Randwicked ҉ 14:13, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable player with four ARL/NRL clubs. Meets WP:BIO as professional sportsman. Article needs cleanup though. Capitalistroadster 20:04, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 20:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Ta bu shi da yu 22:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Could do with a better picture (light flash isn't spectacular). Apart from that there seems to be no problem at all with notability. Also, is it wise for a nominator to only be asserting a weak delete vote, shouldn't they be sure before they bring things here. Ansell Review my progress! 12:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notable.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 00:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Ansell. Yanksox 05:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.