Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Mac

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 23:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Mac[edit]

Bruce Mac (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of a living person with no evidence of notability. Only provided sources are subject's own web site and IMDb listing. Prod-blp tag removed by article creator without explanation or improvement. --Finngall talk 14:11, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: After some searching, I found some sources ([1][2][3][4][5][6]). However, most of them (except for #3) may not pass WP:V.
Additionally, subject doesn't seem notable per WP:FILMMAKER. Even if those sources were implemented, this would still be an issue, so I'm leaning toward delete.—Lucas Thoms, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 15:00, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I checked the trade papers, Hollywood Reporter and Dramalogue and found nothing. What is there seems self-promotional. No RS. Fails WP:GNG/WP:FILMMAKER. SW3 5DL (talk) 22:19, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:GNG fails WP:CREATIVE. I did find this page, hard to tell if it might be independent, doesn't look it, it says it's a showcase site. --Bejnar (talk) 23:08, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.