Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce (family)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Robert T | @ | C 03:49, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Bruce (family)[edit]
Ha ha. Someone has way too much time on their hands. Actually good material, but perhaps rather more suited to a satirical website than an encyclopaedia. Mais oui! 16:36, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nonsense.--Isotope23 16:50, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nonsense. Obviously they read Private Eye... Possible BJAODN? - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 17:12, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, ridiculous. No BJAODN, it just encourages them. --Angr/tɔk tə mi 17:20, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. PJM 17:30, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Angr; not good enough for BJAODN. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 17:38, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Can we Speedy delete this?--Mais oui! 18:31, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]- Redirect to House of Bruce, as per BD2412 below (modified).--Mais oui! 05:12, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. *drew 01:09, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, redirect to Robert I of Scotland, maybe? BD2412 T 03:45, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Rogerd 03:44, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.