Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brown University Orchestra

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) 🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 00:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brown University Orchestra[edit]

Brown University Orchestra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent coverage except for minor awards. Fails WP:BAND. Josefaught (talk) 01:44, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Retaliatory behavior from an ostensible sockpuppet account. The notability of the orchestra as it relates to the local classical music scene is evidenced by this article on a personnel change, published, in the area's dominant publication. Filetime (talk) 07:31, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Does every University orchestra get a wiki article? Does every organization at Brown? I love Brown University as much as anyone, but it seems way over-represented on Wikipedia because it's an old white wealthy institution. Not every statue, building, and organization at Brown requires a standalone wiki article. Seems to me that it would be served well enough with a sentence or two in the main Brown University article. - Kzirkel (talk) 15:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment I personally have no interest in promoting another old white wealthy institution myself, but that's the reality of Wikipedia:Systemic bias and like it or not, this article satisfies WP:GNG, even if I personally agree with your sentiment. ~ Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:48, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 August 25. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:05, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. In addition to the source Filetime mentioned above, the Wall Street Journal article helps establish notability. In response to the comment above, Wikipedia is WP:NOTPAPER. There is nothing stopping you from improving the coverage of other universities on Wikipedia. Brown University is already lengthy and doesn't need more content added into it. NemesisAT (talk) 10:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 10:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per User:NemesisAT. We are all WP:VOLUNTEERS so if a topic doesn't interest you, just avoid it. ~ Shushugah (he/him • talk) 10:52, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The subject has considerable coverage in reliable sources, demonstrating some notability. Multi7001 (talk) 18:11, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.