Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brown Skin Brunchin'

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) asilvering (talk) 23:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brown Skin Brunchin'[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

About 47 Google results. Possibly promotional entry. While there are a few local news sources in ABC affiliates in Sacramento and Vegas, and a couple of magazine profiles of the creators of the app, neither the creators nor the app seem to have WP:SIGCOV at this time. Andre🚐 09:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and United States of America. Owen× ☎ 09:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 11:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I think the sourcing provided does actually demonstrate that there is significant coverage in reliable sources. Were they just from one local source, I might agree, but these come from various different localities and different periodicals. I would also disagree that it's promotional, it's too short and to-the-point to read that way. --Grnrchst (talk) 13:29, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:37, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sourcing within the article and a Google search show that there is significant coverage in multiple reliable sources beyond passing mentions, even if these sources are local. Similar rationale behind keeping this article: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tiny_Urban_Kitchen pinktoebeans ^(talk) 15:08, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There's is significant coverage from multiple news sources. The article could use some improvement but it seems to be notable. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 21:02, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There is significant coverage in a national magazine and other major publications across the United States. Meets notability threshold. Rublamb (talk) 00:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.