Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Broughton Hall, Flintshire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Broughton Hall, Flintshire[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article says that it was a large country house, but this does not enhance any notability factor for this article, and I tried to find any suitable websources, but couldn't find any. The article also mentions Sir John Glynne as one of the former owners, however on Sir John Glynne's article there is no mention about it. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 05:19, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. <Sigh>. Someone else who doesn't appreciate that there are sources other than the internet and that a building demolished before the internet began is not likely to have many mentions. Even having said that, a search in the (subscription only) Times Digital Archive brought up several mentions. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have corrected the article, there was a mistake in one of my sources, I have added more facts that I have referenced, a photo exists with Flintshire Record Office of the house. -- User:Ricko99dog 17:56, 29 March 2011 (BST)
Keep - seems to be notable enough to sustain an article. That the article needs improvement ({{infobox building}} to start with) is not a reason to delete. Although demolished in the 1970s, it may have been a listed building, which would further add weight to the case for notability. Mjroots (talk) 04:58, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.