Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brothel Art Museum

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 11:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brothel Art Museum[edit]

Brothel Art Museum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable bar. JaGatalk 07:37, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Searches don't find any notable references that any other bar in the world wouldn't have. Sleepy2222 (talk) 07:50, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The notability of the bar doesn't seem to be well substantiated by a single link from a not very notable publication.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 13:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hmmm - seems to be a number of news hits.  J L G 4 1 0 4  20:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't find these sufficient to make notability.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 12:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As per Jlg4104's link to the news hits for the subject. Pastor Theo (talk) 02:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I would invite participants in this discussion to consider what they would do with such an article based on a few local press reports in, for example, Bolivia or Mali. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:01, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. A brothel isn't particularly interesting, anywhere in the world. A brothel art museum is, anywhere in the world. One that meets minimum standards of notability on WP, anywhere in the world, could be covered in WP. Not sure what the quibble is. If it's that you're suggesting a U.S.A.-centric bias, then toward what? American brothels? American brothel art museums? Or American coverage of American brothel art museums? Personally, I find the concept of a sex museum more interesting, in any event.  J L G 4 1 0 4  20:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 08:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – The number of news results seems to cover quite a time period and from all different sources... Sounds notable to me, though, the article definitely needs to be expanded... Subverted (talk • contribs) 12:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: After viewing several references, it seems that this 'museum' is nothing more than a lackluster wall, adjacent to the Cherry Patch Ranch. Law shoot! 14:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete? It's a wall, in a bar. If any article should exist here it would be one for the mother bar, if that's notable enough. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 21:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brothel_Art_Museum&oldid=1142176512"