Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brookstreet Hotel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brookstreet Hotel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This hotel is WP:Run-of-the-mill and fails WP:NBUILD and WP:GNG Wikiwriter700 (talk) 19:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:22, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:22, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 21:22, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable run-of-the-mill hotel.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete Simply hosting the Bilderberg conference once is not enough. Mangoe (talk) 23:45, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
draftify instead of delete : Interested users may expand the article with reliabe sources in the draftspace. Its also important to note the age of the article in this case.Shahoodu (talk) 11:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not a notable building in terms of WP:SIRS or in terms of heritage listings Spiderone 22:19, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.