Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Mitchell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Delaware. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 18:11, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Brooke Mitchell[edit]

Brooke Mitchell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mitchell's only claim to notability is being Miss Delaware. This is not enough to establish notability. The article has what looks to be an impressive list of citations. However about half of them are beauty pageant PR releases. Others are name droppings related to her being a sub-state level teenage beauty pageant winner. Even the sources on her being Miss Delaware are largely those from her local paper. My google search came up with nothing substantial to show that she is notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:42, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per nom. MMall124 (talk) 17:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This discussion was originally closed as no consensus because there is a lack of Wikipedia consensus on the matter on December 6th, after I presented some issues to the closer, and another editor argued that these should be considered on a case by case basis, the administrator who closed gave permission to reopen this discussion. I primarily state this so the time frame when this discussion has actually been open can be clearly seen. It was closed from early December 6th (about 7 GMT) to about 16 GMT on December 9th.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:12, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 01:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - She has a number of sources from reliable secondary sources, but being a beauty pageant winner is not enough in itself to prove notability.--CaroleHenson (talk) 03:12, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- insufficient claim of notability with a state level pageant win. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Miss Delaware, mentioned there. SSTflyer 15:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.