Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brooke Corte

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 02:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brooke Corte[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement. Just a journalist going about their job. No awards, no in-depth coverage of their significance outside the usual short written-by-subject non-independent bios or press-release reprints like [1]. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:46, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Co-host of newly-launched flagship national television program, previous co-host of national breakfast television program, noted business journalist. Article has sources indicating verifiable coverage, per WP:NEXIST the absence of citations in an article does not indicate not notable. Quick search produces multiple instances of interviews, profiles and coverage. Meets the GNG and CELEBRITY -- Whats new?^(talk) 21:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- You keep defending your articles about non-notable journalists, but saying they are notable doesn't make them so. Being a co-host, etc. is not sufficient for notability. If you have better sources than the ones you have used in the article, please post them here for a review. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:37, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 01:03, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Negligible independent reliable sources about the subject. Aoziwe (talk) 11:06, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or draftify, I'm not finding support for notability in either the current sources or a quick google search. valereee (talk) 13:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Couldn't find any reliable, significant material via ProQuest news search. Fails WP:BIO. Cabrils (talk) 04:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.