The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123(e) 20:05, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unencyclopaedic article created by publicist. Esoteric is fair comment; seems like it's more esoteric than my personal notability standards allow anyway. Just zis Guy you know? 11:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
