Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brokeback

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete (aeropagitica) 17:04, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brokeback[edit]

Neologism based on Brokeback Mountain. Non-notable, unstable, uncommon etc. etc. smurrayinchester^{(User), (Talk)} 09:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but delete recently added neologism part. Brokeback works fine as a disambig, and it shouldn't be deleted just because some anon newbie added something that clearly doesn't belong there. I've been keeping this article neologism-free for a while, but doing this now that it's under AfD doesn't work, so I guess we'll let the process run its course. Haakon 10:39, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, it is not needed as a disambiguation page, either, since there is no article on the band. It could be redirected to the movie, but I don't see a need for that, since it is also a neologism and there is no evidence that the movie is referred to by "Brokeback" alone. -- Kjkolb 11:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn unverified protologism (and unnecessary disambig page). Esquizombi 14:37, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as above. For great justice. 16:47, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's no need for a disambiguation page, and that neologism business has to go. Brian G. Crawford 18:56, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per User:Brian G. Crawford. --Hetar 20:31, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no needed as a disambiguation page. Piccadilly 20:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 03:18, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Brokeback Mountain as a potential link for the lazy MLA 12:36, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.