Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brodie Foster Hubbard (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brodie Foster Hubbard[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet BAND, MUSICIAN, ACTOR, or any specialty criteria, and does not meet GNG either. None of the Phoenix Times coverage available meets the definition of non-trivial. A "going away party" (first source, now at this URL)at a local venue is not a notable event. All of the older coverage is dead. Basically, the sourcing for this article is a whole bunch of little tiny things that he was tangentially involved with, and nothing the subject did himself. Another example is the "Grand Ave. Tonight" source: It's mainly about Kevin Patterson, and Hubbard is his sidekick. It turns out that he was promoted from writer of the show because it was a Ryan Avery vehicle, and was featured in Hi, My Name is Ryan for the same reason. Thus Hubbard's "IMDB credits" are a bit appearance in a documentary in a local context and an online movie. He has only been nominated for a local music award (and has not won), and has not released any of his work commercially. Most of the article sources are dead, most of those that are not are non-RS, and other than that, there's really not much about him at all. Initial AFD in 2006 was likely correct about this being a vanity article. MSJapan (talk) 00:07, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, done a lot but none of it meets WP:GNG since the sources are all trivial. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 23:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TPH. — Waterfox ^~talk~ 23:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.