Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brockmans Gin (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:37, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brockmans Gin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article that does not establish product notability. Industry awards do not prove notability in industries that give awards in order to advertise. No in-depth independent coverage. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:48, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:48, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:48, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Brockmans Gin. Robert McClenon (talk) 10:34, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Ten years after the subject's article was first deleted, there is nothing new in terms of WP:SIGCOV. "It's gin. It's in a black bottle." A search reveals primarily promotional mentions, contests and press releases. The new article is as promotional as the 2008 article was. Fails WP:GNG. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 17:52, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of notability. In fact I considered speedily deleting the article, as it was clearly created in order to evade the outcome of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Brockmans Gin. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - promotional. The author has said that he removed all the promotional material - well nearly all the promotion - and almost nothing is left. How did this article last for 2 days? Smallbones_(smalltalk) 00:38, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Concur with all of the above. Risker (talk) 00:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.