Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brixton Overcoat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:11, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brixton Overcoat[edit]

Original research/neologism. Doesn't quite fit speedy. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 21:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's almost no content and what there is is rubbish. Questions of race relations in the UK are dealt with properly elsewhere. The term could be added to such an article as an example of slang if good sources exist. Nick mallory 02:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. No content, just POV in a philosophical/social debate. --SquidSK ^(1MC^•^log) 09:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I am black, and have lived in Brixton for 22 years, and have never heard this expression. --User:80.254.147.20 14:09, 29 June 2007

_Major Revision of Brixton Overcoat entry. 20:08, 21 June 2007 (GMT)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie 09:00, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Term apparently never used aside from the title of one obscure book, which this may well be stealth spam for. Also appears on wikitionary's "List of protologisms". Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.