Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Columbia's Children's Hospital
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per apparent bad faith nom. Also, seems notable to me. Non admin closure. Whsitchy 16:27, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
British Columbia's Children's Hospital[edit]
- British Columbia's Children's Hospital (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Violates Notability Policy. A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of secondary sources. ObsequiosityFYM 23:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- '
Speedy Keep'. Comment: Yes independent sources are needed but this is possible bad faith nomination related to nom's vandalism of User:Agent 86 page. Also see user's nom: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vancouver Fringe Festival, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insurance Corporation of British Columbia and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Boy (Restaurant Chain). Full Disclosure: I am employed in public relations for this hospital. Canuckle 00:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply] - Keep. A look at what links here, the fact that the corporation is a monopoly crown corporation from which it is mandatory that every driver in BC purchase insurance from and that the company is a Crown corporation make this company worthy of note. --KenWalker | Talk 06:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I believe it satisfies WP:CORP. --Evb-wiki 12:27, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep One of the country's major children's hospitals. --Charlene 13:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep I'll go further than Canuckle- this clearly a bad faith nomination by a known vandal Lurker 13:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.