Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Airways Flight 6234

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 14:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

British Airways Flight 6234[edit]

British Airways Flight 6234 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable aviation accident. Landing gear collapses happen all the time. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - completely non-notable. Not even for an accidents section.--Petebutt (talk) 21:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no evidence that it is notable just a bad day at the office. MilborneOne (talk) 21:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as I see no better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 04:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. No indication of lasting notability. Onel5969 TT me 12:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.