Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briskman Briskman & Greenberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Briskman Briskman & Greenberg[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I started trimming this after a rather trivial update, but other than a bunch of references that involve Mr Greenberg there is almost nothing about the company itself (a GNews search finds exactly 1 hit). In other words, this would appear to be a MILL law firm failing CORP. Primefac (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Primefac (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Primefac (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Primefac (talk) 18:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — does not appear notable by WP:CORPDEPTH. 'Trivia Updater',

Lindenfall (talk) 19:41, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom: very run of the mill law firm. Also, this fails my standards for notable law firms and lawyers. Some of their attorneys are "active" in bar associations. I should hope so! The sourcing is especially poor. Bearian (talk) 20:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom: a law firm is not notable just because it's a law firm. There does not seem to be anything indicating notability. Cosmic Sans (talk) 18:49, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No significant coverage per WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 17:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable, does not meet WP:CORP. Alex-h (talk) 08:26, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Through founded in 1981 not clear how this particular law firm is notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:03, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.