Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brisbane Ladies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spebi 23:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brisbane Ladies[edit]

Non-notable song lyrics, inappropriate for an encyclopedia - Shiftchange (talk) 00:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Canley (talk) 00:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT#LYRICS. Unless notability can be asserted. 00:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC) Keep per HSR. It seems notable now, just get rid of the lyrics, and write it a bit more. This article deserves a chance. J-ſtan^Contribs_{User page} 02:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom & J-stan. Bucketsofg 00:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: unless the lyrics violate a copyright, the song is notable given the amount of coverage on the Internet and verifiable from third-party sources per WP:V. Mh29255 (talk) 01:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Remove the lyrics, and turn it into an encyclopedia article about this folk song which appears to have a rich history dating back over 100 years.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 02:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per addition of sources, notability now asserted. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 02:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, article in its current state is fine. Lankiveil (talk) 04:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Remove the lyrics and keep or merge to Spanish Ladies. JIP | Talk 08:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Notability is clear. Article is in good shape now.JQ (talk) 12:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notability seems to have been established. The article can be expanded as time permits. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 16:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as long as the article is expanded and lyrics are removed. More sources, reliable ones, also need to be found. Tim meh ^contribs 18:46, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment if there is no copyright on the lyrics - and it may have expired - they could be transwikid to wikisource.Ga rr ie 03:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I don't see any need to remove the lyrics - plenty of precedent for keeping them (eg Waltzing Matilda has lyrics plus several variations probably too many variations but that is another debate) - interesting to compare with Spanish Ladies easily without going to another site .--Matilda ^talk 06:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.