Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brightworks Interactive Marketing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 14:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brightworks Interactive Marketing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly open and shut case of a non-notable company as I found no better coverage and this being the best I found. I would've pinged the one tagger but it seems he's not considerably active and this simply has not improved since starting in April 2011. SwisterTwister talk 07:01, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wonder if this could be PRODed or speedy deleted. Pretty clearly fails notability guidelines. mikeman67 (talk) 14:20, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 11:29, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Of five sources, two are dead links. The others are from association brochures or websites. Since the subject of the article is apparently a member of the associations, these sources are not independent. David.thompson.esq (talk) 17:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searches turned up nothing to show it passes either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.