Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brigette DePape
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles 01:12, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Brigette DePape[edit]
- Brigette DePape (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
She is only notable for one event, therefore as per WP:SINGLEEVENT she does not require her own article. Aaaccc (talk), 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- Weak Keep, this full-article review of her play in the Sask. Star-Phoenix is, just, enough to demonstrate a component of notability that extends beyond the single event. --j⚛e deckertalk 17:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, only notable for one event. I do not think a play in the Saskatoon Fringe Theatre Festival is notable by Wikipedia standards. Eiad77 (talk) 19:57, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 01:48, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Like her or not, she HAS received coverage for more that just one event.[1] We do not judge only by today's news, but through coverage covering a length of time and all events in her life. The GNG is met. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:25, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per j⚛e decker & Schmidt. The subject has received significant coverage in reliable sources beyond a single event and satisfies WP:N.--JayJasper (talk) 23:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.