Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgette Kerkove

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:40, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bridgette Kerkove[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the sources bar the book are typical industry publicity and awards hype. The book is about a film and there is not enough bio to hang this off. Basically she did a film and later divorced her husband. Fails notability and a living bio should do better than this. Suggest we redirect to the ball of fame Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam (talk) 23:30, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam (talk) 23:30, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam (talk) 23:30, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I always try to avoid "Delete" votes in a BLP but in this case I strongly agree with the nominator.--SharabSalam (talk) 23:32, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:54, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:56, 20 December 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Delete All the references except the book are from the lying, promotional porn industry publicity machine. We must keep that crap out of the encylopedia. The book coverage is far too thin for a BLP. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:54, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a bunch of what is functionally news releases does not add up to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:42, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since subject fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. The text reeks of promotional sewage, which never helps. -The Gnome (talk) 19:19, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A simple google search shows nothing ,no news ,no anythingGeorgiamarlins (talk) 20:28, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.