Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridgeton Estate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 06:04, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bridgeton Estate[edit]

Bridgeton Estate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the general notability guideline, lack of reliable sources. Anonymous single-purpose account keeps deleting PROD, so going this route. Drm310 (talk) 20:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as spam for a subdivision. We are not Remaxipedia. Bearian (talk) 22:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as complete spam. Pity there's no photo... ;-) - Takeaway (talk) 03:54, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: The extent of the WP:SPAM is too obvious to ignore. Wikicology (talk) 11:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete pretty clear it is just spam. I am One of Many (talk) 05:58, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.