Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bridge Communications

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 17:19, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bridge Communications[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:41, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. While the first article is more about the founding couple and their exploits, the PBS interview does have something in it that points to more of it. Weak on account of that detail, however. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 07:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep If they did in fact ship the first commercial router, that's enough for notability DGG ( talk ) 06:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why? -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 02:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notability adequately demonstrated by refs. --Kvng (talk) 14:18, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.