Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bride campaign

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 12:24, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bride campaign[edit]

There are no reliable sources to provide verifiability or establish notability. A proposed deletion was contested with an outline of the objection posted on Talk: Bride campaign, so bringing this to AFD. Whpq (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Of the three links in the reference section, one goes to a blog with one post that's five days old, and the other two takes you to the front page of PEEL magazine, and to flickr. Hunting on the internet turns up nothing more than a couple of Myspace pages and a flickr account. All in all, it's a vanity article. --Kristjan Wager (talk) 18:40, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable since it hasn't been reported on by secondary sources. Northwestgnome (talk) 19:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of notability. Edward321 (talk) 00:18, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of notability. JJL (talk) 03:38, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.