The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page☎ ) 11:32, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Just barely any claim to notability, but vanity article.
Delete. Close to a speedy candidate, but I think a nominal claim of notability can be teased out of the book publication. And of course, it's tempting for me to support it because it's published on "Lulu Press"... Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 09:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. PJM 12:39, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Just barely outside speedy zone. Stifle 02:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
