Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian M. Nelson, Esq.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow delete. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 20:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brian M. Nelson, Esq.[edit]

Resume for non-notable living person Madcoverboy (talk) 12:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 08:54, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The page is a redirect (I am guessing this is meant to be listed for the article the listed article redirects too?) ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 21:45, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Madcoverboy (talk) 22:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Madcoverboy (talk) 22:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- Madcoverboy (talk) 22:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Skomorokh 00:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as assertion of notability is weak and no third party sources are give. - Raj Krishnamurthy (talk) 02:39, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This smelled like a vanity article to me even before I noticed that it was created by User:Bmnlaw. Nevertheless, I will W:AGF. - Raj Krishnamurthy (talk) 02:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete reads like a resume. nn lawyer. Reso lute 03:02, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Meets no notability criteria in WP:BIO, also, appears article subject is its creator.--Finalnight (talk) 04:02, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - comes close to notability a few times, but doesn't quite make it. --T-rex 04:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Does not meet WP:BIO criteria, and, from the looks of it, never will. JBsupreme (talk) 06:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Black ngold29 06:38, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nonnotable attorney. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks like this lawyer's unverified résumé. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is vanity at worst, and COI at best. Just shy of notable, despite his seemingly impressive resume. I also feel like noting that User:Bmnlaw's only other edit was to add his name to notable residents of Shrewsbury, New Jersey. Addionne (talk) 16:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per Resoluto and NawlinWiki ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 17:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.