Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Kwon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 01:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Kwon[edit]

Delete. Spam? Vanity? Not notable. Bad article not worth editing. Shoehorn 17:45, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article is not that badly written, but just being an e-mail spammer does not make a person encyclopedically significant. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Let's no encourage spammers. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 11:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable enough. --Latinus (talk (el:)) 17:14, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unless you go to jail and then get your conviction overturned by the SCOTUS, neither you nor your misdeeds are not worthy of a Wikipedia entry. --Kinu 08:13, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.