Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian F. Martin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. G5 already refused. This smacks of asking the other parent Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:52, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brian F. Martin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested Prod Fails WP:GNG and Declined AFC submission and a paid article created in violation of block and ban and thus eligible under WP:G5.Please refer to this Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Seeknikkihi.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Even though the article was originally created by a now banned user, a simple google search reveals several news articles on the subject from reliable sources. Including Los angeles Times, The New York Times, World Neighbors and many others Cada mori (talk) 21:08, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:G5 this page has no substantial edits by others almost entirely created by user socking as per this last edit done by that user and the other edits are basically tagging the page.This is about the New York Times about a sale of a house.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:15, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Brian F. Martin and his work to bring awareness of children brought up in homes of domestic violence even caused Congress to take action. Jon Conyers, Jr, a congressional member of the house even thanked posted information on his personal blog about this. The Hill, a government policy website also posted information on this topic and the charity. It seems this guy has nothing to gain from this article and is making a notable impact on society. John Conyers & Makers of Memories The Hill & Congress — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.15.216.179 (talk) 01:33, 19 April 2015 (UTC) — 4.15.216.179 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notability is established by sources listed above and others. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 12:25, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable lacks significant coverage and written by banned users.2001:E68:4414:1C38:6C5E:EA17:1ED8:AAB6 (talk) 15:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.