Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Sheridan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Academic Challenger (talk) 21:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Sheridan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non notable BLP. WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of reliable sources to improve article. Was nominated for BLPPROD by another editor but this was deprodded as some sources (IMDB) were already present on the page. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 23:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, not enough RS to be found. Caro7200 (talk) 12:52, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Having one source is not sufficient for notability, especially if it is a passing mentions. I PRODded the article, but it was declined by GB fan. Koridas ^talk? 17:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- User talk:Koridas I agree with you. I’ve fallen into this Wiki-bureaucracy trap before. It looks like it was declined because with a BLPPROD, there must not be any sources at all, even if it’s one as unreliable as IMDB. If you’d done a normal PROD, it would probably have been deleted by now. Personally, I think this is needlessly bureaucratic but it is the consensus of the community. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 19:41, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I am unable to find any significant coverage in reliable sources that would establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 14:27, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.