Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Reylander

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:05, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Reylander[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any references in reliable sources, citation in British Comedy Guide regarding Trigger Happy TV role is only in passing. Fails GNG. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 13:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 13:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:01, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about him, aside from a source from British Comedy Guide. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 06:54, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do not Delete: Wikipedia:Deletion policy says "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." According to history its been on wikipedia for over 10 years, why delete now??? Unsourced material has been removed. It just needs tidying up is all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PenelopeCJ (talk • contribs) 22:07, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: agree with nom, no reliable sources. Tacyarg (talk) 00:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Sadly, I don't think this page has much chance of being improved to the point where it passes the notability standards. The subject only has one role that might contribute to WP:NACTOR, and WP:GNG is not scaled, either. Dflaw4 (talk) 11:25, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. FWIW, I don't think it can be improved. Bearian (talk) 16:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.