Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Phillips (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 10:01, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Phillips[edit]

fails WP:CREATIVE, lacks third party sources to establish notability. simply being a radio broadcaster is not sufficient. Michellecrisp (talk) 01:32, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep definitely has a claim to notability if he has broadcasted on a major regional or national radio show, definitely needs to be sourced, though. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 03:11, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As per above. If articles on broadcasters such as Tom Larscheid or John Shorthouse manage to stay, I say the same can be said about Brett Phillips. The article just needs more work on it. ThePointblank (talk) 06:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not an argument. Please consider this article on its own merits. Also Tom Larschied appears not to have its own article? Did you spell it right? Michellecrisp (talk) 07:00, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed comment. ThePointblank (talk) 07:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 00:29, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 11:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks notability, lacks 3rd party sources.--Rtphokie (talk) 17:40, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced BLP of someone of marginal notability. RMHED (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.