Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Manning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:23, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Manning[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sourcing is minimal at best and I could find no better. Prod removed because article was previously prodded in 2006 Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 12:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 12:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete insufficient significant coverage to demonstrate notability.Brian O'Conner 22:47, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I couldn't find much either: although there are quite a few passing mentions in the press and a bit of coverage available via ProQuest/Newspapers.com, none of it seems to amount to sigcov. Neither the GNG nor any applicable SNG appear to be met. One would expect someone who's been associated with so many notable people to be notable in his own right, but the sourcing simply doesn't bear that out. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:36, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.