Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Luskin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:53, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Luskin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found one ref besides myspace here. The article has been cleaned up good by editors, but it started as a poor vanity article. Is the one ref enough to keep this, afaik fails all of wp:music Pirate^Argh!!1! 22:29, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not appear to pass criterion 1 of WP:MUSICBIO, as I can not find that he "has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works". Neither does he seem to satisfy any of the other criteria. Gongshow ^Talk 22:35, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - The article says he's a member of a group called Shotty No Blitz. As you can see, that's a red link, so surely if a band is non-notable, then its members are also non-notable. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 00:13, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As the one who removed all of the nonsense from the article in the first instance i found it very lacking in any real content but felt it would be hypocritical for me to nom it for deletion. It could have been taken as bitey. The one ref that was subsequently found by the nominator isn't enough to meet WP:MUSIC. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 09:28, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 13:04, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per DitzyNizzy; I should also note that I was unable to find any references for the band. The Corsair piece in the external links is this article's best shot, but I don't think we can justify an article based on a single news story. Cerebellum (talk) 22:22, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a single article in a college paper does not establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 17:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.