Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Leigh Dicks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:23, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Leigh Dicks[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:BIO. Likely conflict of interest with article creator. Most of the references mention the subject only in passing and the majority are from the publication where he is a writer. Leivick (talk) 21:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:58, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (Discussion) 22:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:03, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gnews search could not find significant coverage in independent sources, although the guy does write a lot of columns for the Santa Barbara Independent. Ray^Talk 21:08, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.