Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Eldredge (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. Subject is clearly notable. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:03, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brett Eldredge (album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album article with little more than a track listing having no indication of notability Jax 0677 (talk) 01:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or redirect until it charts. There would be no point to deleting this; it was just released and is yet to chart anywhere because of that. It has the potential to be expanded. There is a claim of notability because the artist who made it is a notable country artist. However, if there is a concern about the notability of this article in particular, it could easily be redirected until such a time as an editor does expand it. I believe this nomination is a waste of time because I sincerely doubt the Wikipedia community would honestly think this is an article worth deleting over simply redirecting it. Ss 112 01:13, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:14, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I think this nominator needs to rethink their conception of "no indication of notability". It's received coverage from extremely mainstream reliable sources like Rolling Stone, AllMusic, Billboard, Billboard again, and CMT (Country Music Television). Please start following through on WP:BEFORE instead of continuing on with these sorts of nominations. Sergecross73 msg me 13:32, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - clearly notable album meeting WP:GNG even if it doesn't chart. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Sergecross73. Coverage exists to pass WP:GNG, and multiple sources have been added to the article. The album is also projected to be number one on next week's US chart, for what it's worth. gongshow talk 02:15, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.