Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brett Edward Stout
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. yandman 16:35, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Brett Edward Stout[edit]
- Brett Edward Stout (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable author, his work is self-published. His other career does not make him notable. This has gone through a speedy deletion tag and a prod, and has been deleted twice previously. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - If the contents of the article aren't substantially (e.g., better) than the deleted version(s), then this is a clear WP:CSD#G4 speedy. As it stands there's nothing there that would hold up to WP:BIO or anything else. §FreeRangeFrog 22:42, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Uh, and I meant to say delete, based on the above. §FreeRangeFrog 22:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete for recreation of previously deleted article... If it's being recreated by some editor account or clear sock, should look into a stern warning about COI/spamming. DreamGuy (talk) 22:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment CSD G4 does not apply here as this article has not previously been deleted via a deletion discussion only by CSD A7. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, NN/self-published....but why doesn't this come up "2nd nom"? 7triton7 (talk) 06:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This is the first AfD nomination. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:45, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Sorry, but there is no evidence that this person is notable as either an author or as a motion picture director. Speedy does not apply, per Malcolmxl5. Bearian (talk) 20:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.