Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Watkins

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is a clear consensus that the references provided are not sufficient to demonstrate notability.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brent Watkins[edit]

Brent Watkins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, I do not believe this person passes the notability criteria for WP:ARTIST Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:57, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please do not delete. Provided references show that this artist has made notable achievements and performed with other notable artists.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:56, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 23:56, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is an autobiography referenced only to an alumni publication. The author should read WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY and WP:COI. Not notable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:01, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • See list of external links for AllMusic discography in addition to various articles (Including JazzTimes magazine) that reference the artist. Artist has also performed with numerous notable groups. Brentmwatkins (talk) 01:24, 5 November 2013 (UTC)brentmwatkins[reply]
    • Sorry, autobiographer, you don't get to iVote twice. Don't you realize that such behavior only draws more attention to your attempts at self-promotion? Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:34, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Additional references have been added. Jaygarcia53 (talk) 01:54, 5 November 2013 (UTC)jaygarcia53[reply]
  • Sorry, my mistake. Didn't realize I couldn't write "keep" again. Brentmwatkins (talk) 01:57, 5 November 2013 (UTC)brentmwatkins[reply]
    • Comment The Jazz Times link is a passing reference of less than a sentence. It does not establish notability. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment The Rivard Report is a local entertainment website started by a husband and wife team in 2012. I do not consider it a reliable source sufficient for establishing notability of a musical performer.Cullen328 Let's discuss it 02:51, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Clerk note: Tagged blocked sockpuppets in this case. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 05:09, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 05:29, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - obvious WP:COI / WP:AUTOBIO with dishonest sock-puppetry thrown in for good measure. Want an article about yourself? Take it to WP:RA. But I don't think the subject meets WP:GNG given the limited geographical scope of the sources in question. Stalwart111 02:42, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Borderline, but to me, seems to fail notability. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:10, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.