Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent Bailey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brent Bailey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined a PROD as there are sources, but the sources are trivial and do not establish notability as far as I can see. Guy (Help!) 09:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 10:17, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 10:17, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I see nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 05:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 16:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:44, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging MichaelQSchmidt and Onel5969. SwisterTwister talk 20:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete - Lots of hits for folks with this name on the search engines, but can't find any in-depth coverage to show this particular actor's notability. He did have one of the two leads on an Emmy-Award winning show, Emma Approved. It's a web-based show, but a Creative Content Emmy is still a major Emmy (as opposed to a Regional Emmy). But other than that, he hasn't had a real significant role. If someone were to come up with some in-depth references from reliable sources that I couldn't find, I'd be more than willing to re-think my !vote. Ping me if you do. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep and allow this reasonably new article further expansion and sourcing per career meeting WP:ENT and recognitions meeting WP:ANYBIO, for it was not all too difficult to find that he has received multiple nominations... an Indie Series Awards nomination as 'Best Lead Actor' for My Synthesized Life, a Streamy Awards nomination for 'Best Male Actor in a Comedy Web Series' for Emma Approved, and a shared International Academy of Web Television award nomination for 'Best Ensemble Performance' for Emma Approved. Diligence is often fruitful. Pinging JzG, SwisterTwister, and onel5969 Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to allow more editors time to chime in. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - MichaelQSchmidt's are well-taken, and I saw those before casting my !vote, but those are not notable awards. To me it's still a question of in-depth coverage, but still willing to take another look if that coverage appears. Btw, MQS, your ping didn't work - just happened back to this article since it was still open. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your personal interpretation of awards is fine, but I base mine own upon award notability established through WP:GNG. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 14:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
MichaelQSchmidt - as do I. You simply interpret it differently than I do. There are awards which have their own pages, yet they are not considered important enough to show notability of their recipients on their own. Take care. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: Well, even if an editor chooses to personally reinterpret WP:ANYBIO, Bailey's career meets WP:ENT and coverage found through due diligence meets WP:GNG. Thanks. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 14:14, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, sources, credits, prizes now on page add up to keep.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.