Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breno Masi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails WP:GNG. Article can be recreated if a translated version with appropriate referencing can be produced. Philg88 ^♦talk 05:55, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Breno Masi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just how notable is being the first person in Brazil to unlock an iPhone? I don't think it is, but I could be wrong. llywrch (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:03, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not an achievement notable enough to have own page here. This is laughable. -A Wild Abigail Appears! _{Capture me.} _Moves. 02:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The original author of the article created it one month ago, saying it is actively undergoing translation. They've done nothing since. I see no indication of notability -- just short lived, single event type coverage. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 04:43, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - not notable. Karlhard (talk) 02:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The Portuguese Wikipedia article, from which this one was being translated, claims far more for the subject than this one currently does. Judging from the nomination and comments above supporting deletion, it seems that the nominator and at least some of the commenters haven't looked at it at all. My knowledge of Portuguese is almost non-existent but, with the help of Google Translate, I get the impression that the Portuguese Wikipedia article is distinctly over-promotional, and the list of references doesn't look inspiring. However, I am not in a position to judge them, and some at least might just support notability. Perhaps someone with a bit more knowledge of Portuguese than I have could look at the Portuguese sources and give an informed opinion. PWilkinson (talk) 12:03, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.