Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan Norman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:41, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan Norman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:BLP. When conducting WP:BEFORE, very few sources come back other than user submitted content (IMDB & Facebook) in regards to the actor. There is a journalist and thief that seem to have most of the news sources. Norman seems to mostly have minor roles in television. Mkdw ^talk 08:52, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This person's roles to date do not appear to meet WP:ENT, and I'm unable to find significant coverage sufficient to meet WP:GNG at this time. Gong show 21:41, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Promotional article for wannabe. Has been trying to be an actor for a bit over a year. Seems to have gotten some work as an extra and not much better. Lead says, "He is best known for his upcoming role in the Gregori J. Martin film A Place Called Hollywood." Yet that film's website does not list him in the cast. If and when he becomes notable, let's have this article back, but for now, its a clear delete. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:40, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice as being TOO SOON. A few minor roles in non-notable short films fails WP:ENT. The article itself acknowledges TOO SOON when it states he is "best known" for something that has not yet happened. However, when A Place Called Hollywood and Star Trek Into Darkness are finished and released, he may get the coverage meriting inclusion herein. Until then, we can wait. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.