Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan Gibbons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan Gibbons[edit]

Brendan Gibbons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficiently notable collegiate placekicker who did not play at professional level and who received no major college awards (not even first- or second-team all-conference recognition). Fails WP:GNG, WP:NGRIDIRON and WP:NCOLLATH. The only significant coverage he received in reliable, independent media outlets relates principally to unproven (at least in a criminal court) allegations that he sexually assaulted a female student which raise WP:BLP1E concerns. Cbl62 (talk) 14:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.
  • Delete - Non-notable college football player: delete per nominator's rationale and comments. Subject oes not satisfy the relevant specific notability guidelines for college athletes per WP:NCOLLATH or professional football players per WP:NGRIDIRON, and there is insufficient significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources to satisfy the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG. Regarding GNG, what significant coverage there is was found on the athletic department website or the university student newspaper -- neither of which satisfies the "independent source" criteria. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:44, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I'm not finding any measure of notability here.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.