Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenda tan sock hua
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 01:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Brenda tan sock hua[edit]
- Brenda tan sock hua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 15:52, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Promotional from beginning to end: ....a business coach and entrepreneur living in Singapore and expert on team management, leadership and organizational culture, and development .... Being dynamic, confident and driven to succeed in life, Brenda believe in 3 major investments, namely reading self-improvement books, attending courses and having a good coach. She have multiple coaches for my business, fitness and personal interests such as competitive ballroom dancing and meditation. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:14, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:N WP:BIO etc... and is pretty much a WP:RESUME - Pmedema (talk) 22:17, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - bollocks and puffery, lacking any verifiability. Bearian (talk) 22:16, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Tofutwitch11-Chat -How'd I do? 01:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.